Okay, okay... I've been away for a bit longer than I'd have liked... I just moved earlier this month, and my blogging computer's been on the fritz since, so I'm using an alternate computer to try to get things up to speed. I'm using this weekend to play catch-up with the big topics I should have covered over the last four weeks.
Let's start with Dora the Explorer.
Two days after my last post, I found THIS news story about the House of Barbie, Mattel, and Viacom subsidiary Nickelodeon unveiling a mysterious silhouette image of what they claimed was the first piece in a new branded image for the character that...
Here's the image in question:

On Monday, DailyStab.com leaked the real thing:
Hmmmm. (*cue Vader voice) I find your lack of youth disturbing.
Now for the side-by-side:
Wait a minute.... They shouldn't be that close together! We all saw Timecop! How many times do I have to say that the same matter can't exist in two places at once......!?!
.................Much better.
Anyway, the controversy in this comes from various parents' groups going up-in-arms over sweet, wholesome, original-recipe Dora getting overly maturized into a version of herself that's arguably completely unlike what this character would have been like by this point (New Dora is approximately 12 years old). I mean, it's not like there's something to these fears of unnecessarily revamping girl-friendly fictional characters into made-up, shallow, fashion-crazed shadows of their former selves......
Oh, wait. I almost forgot. Nickelodeon has done this before:
...Heck, sometimes it happens in reverse order of release:
Oh, and let's not forget about the literal grandmother of vulgar girls' toys:
Geez, that Barbie one says it all, huh? From "Ready for summertime days and nights" to "Rover, I'm gonna scoop your poop, all right?" to "Roxanne... You don't have to put on the red light" in only fifty years. Impressive. Or not.
Getting back to Dora though, some believe this is a very unhealthy step in the wrong direction in the evolution of this brand, others say they don't believe in evolution, and that Sarah Palin will rise again in 2012. Personally, I'm grateful that the sluttiness is not strong with this one. Thankfully, the worst we have to worry about with this, at the beginning anyway, is adjusting to Dora learning more about how to use her parents' credit card at the mall, and less about the Spanish word for "library."
............."La Biblioteca," I believe.
Look, I'm not a parent, or a tweenage girl, but seriously folks, we all know there's something to be said for being careful of what we expose kids to under the pretext of child-friendly fun. That Black-Canary Barbie on the right in the above photo, for example. If you had told a woman twenty or thirty years ago that there's a good chance her young daughter would be dressing her dolls in fishnet stockings and goth-friendly leather jackets, you might have altered the future so that you have to play Chuck Berry songs at the Enchantment Under the Sea ball, or your then-teenage parents won't fall in love and you'll cease to exist.
Robert Zemeckis movies aside, you'd probably be institutionalized. Today's Toys R Us catalog however verifies a dark reality where we can't help but question where and when the line of morality in marketing images and strategies to children is finally crossed. What press release will have to be released before we start holding these companies accountable for what they try to sell our kids? And let's not kid ourselves by thinking even for a moment that it'll stop or even get better with suddenly promoting fashion and shopping over knowledge and exploration, like Dora has done. Dora's still getting plenty of young viewers as it is, but I guess that's not good enough. Spongebob's tenth anniversary is this year. and did they change their character designs eight years in? NO! Did Bart and Lisa Simpson enter puberty, twenty years in? NO! Whatever happened to "if it ain't broke, don't fix it?"
Bottom Line: It could've turned out much, MUCH worse. Since this HAS to exist, I'm on the side of the bloggers who say let's wait til the pilot hits air, and see what they have to offer. Then criticize the crap out of it once they overstep their bounds and cross over to the whore side. All we have to go on with this is a silhouette and a colorized leak image. We have no idea how the general tone for the show's final execution will go. Seriously, the remake/follow-up version could've been worse:
(*shudders)
...But that's just me.
Also, what the crap did that press release mean by "NEW" friends? Is Boots wearing Hush Puppies now? Has Swiper finally stopped swiping? Did he get arrested? Will he be sharing a cell with Bernie Madoff? How do you set bail for a cartoon fox? Why am I overthinking this? Next post'll be more mature.
I gotta play some Bad Company. Get all this preteen girly crap outta my mind. Those three Star Wars references I wrote into this post just aren't enough, I'm sorry.
Later.
-D.


